Urbanek and teammates evaluated how the way that art is described influences responses to that art. They determined that “Vague, impressive language used in descriptions (bullshit) is thought to make art seem more profound and valuable to the viewer. We studied the effect during art exhibitions in real-life gallery-goers who saw paintings of four artists, each with either simplified, neutral, or bullshitty description. We crafted a typical description of each painting, which we later manipulated in terms of language. A simplified description was modified to be concrete and simplistic, while a bullshitty one was very abstract and vague. After analyzing over 1500 ratings, we found the expressive language of descriptions had a negligible effect on the perceived quality and monetary value of art. . . . We conclude that, at least for experienced gallery-goers, the description accompanying a painting has little influence, and the art speaks for itself.”
Arkadiusz Urbanek, Anna Borkowska, Wojciech Milczarski, Jaroslaw Zagrobelny, Jerzy Luty, and Michal Bialek. “Bullshit (Sometimes) Makes the Art (Slightly) More Attractive: A Field Study in Gallery-Goers.” Empirical Studies of the Arts, in press, https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374241237981