Latest Blog Posts

Nejati, Rodiek, and Shepley studied surgical nurses’ ideas about what makes break rooms restorative spaces using visual simulations.  They “assess[ed] the restorative potential of specific design features in hospital staff break areas, investigating nature-related indoor decor, daylight, window views, and direct access to outdoor environments.”  The Nejati team found that when “On a scale of 1–10, nurses evaluated the restorative qualities of (a) direct access to the outdoors through a balcony, (b) an outdoor view through a window, (c) a nature artwork, and (d) an indoor plant, all depicted on images of the same two staff break areas. . . . ratings increased significantly based on higher levels of nature content, from no added amenities, to indoor plants, to nature artwork, to window views, to direct access to the outdoors through a balcony. . . . higher levels of access to nature, daylight, and outdoor environments are perceived to have significantly more restorative potential in healthcare workplaces.”

Adeleh Nejati, Susan Rodiek, and Mardelle Shepley.  2016.  “Using Visual Simulation to Evaluate Qualities of Access to Nature in Hospital Staff Break Areas.”  Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 148, pp. 132-138.

Research by Wilkes and colleagues confirms the psychological benefits of seats that encourage sitting with good posture.  As the investigators report, research has generally shown that “upright posture improves self-esteem and mood in [psychologically] healthy samples.”  Wilkes and her team studied a group of people “with mild to moderate depression.” Some study participants were asked to sit with good posture and others were not. The researchers found that “The postural manipulation significantly improved posture and increased high arousal positive affect. . . .  Upright shoulder angle was associated with lower negative affect and lower anxiety.”  So, study participants who were asked to sit with better posture were in more positive moods and had more energy than people who were not instructed to sit up straight and sat however they chose.

Carissa Wilkes, Rob Kydd, Mark Sagar, and Elizabeth Broadbent.  2017.  “Upright Posture Improves Affect and Fatigue in People with Depressive Symptoms.”  Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, vol. 54 pp. 143-149.

Pineda and her team studied soundscapes in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).  Working with preterm infants born at 28 weeks or less gestation, placed either in private rooms or in open wards, the researchers learned that “There was [significantly] more silence in the private room . . . than the open ward, with an average of 1.9 hours more silence in a 16-hour period. . . . Understanding the NICU auditory environment paves the way for interventions that reduce high levels of adverse sound and enhance positive forms of auditory exposure, such as language.”  The research team reports that premature infants in private rooms may not hear enough people talking, and this may harm their development.  Previous research by Pineda indicated that babies treated in private rooms, when tested at age 2, did not have as advanced language skills as otherwise similar children who were treated in more open wards.

Roberta Pineda, Polly Durant, Amit Mathur, Terrie Inder, Michael Wallendorf, and Bradley Schlaggar.  “Auditory Exposure in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit:  Room Type and Other Predictors.”  The Journal of Pediatrics, in press.

Benson and Coleman have found that more older adults are choosing to “live apart together;” this new way of “co-habitating” has repercussions for home design, for example.  As a press release related to the Benson/Coleman research details,  “Since 1990, the divorce rate among adults 50 years and older has doubled. This trend, along with longer life expectancy, has resulted in many adults forming new partnerships later in life. A new phenomenon called ‘Living Apart Together’ (LAT)—an intimate relationship without a shared residence—is gaining popularity as an alternative form of commitment. . . . while the trend is well understood in Europe, it is lesser known in the U.S. . . .  Benson and . . . Coleman . . . interviewed adults who were at least 60 years old and in committed relationships but lived apart. The researchers found that couples were motivated by desires to stay independent, maintain their own homes, sustain existing family boundaries, and remain financially independent.”  Benson and Coleman’s study was published in the Journal of Marriage and Family.

“Older Adults Embracing ‘Living Apart Together.’” 2017.  Press release, University of Missouri,

A team lead by Hung confirmed that particular sorts of sounds are linked to certain shapes; their work is useful to people naming products and places, for example.  The research by Hung, Styles, and Hsieh, published in Psychological Science, indicates that  “Our tendency to match specific sounds with specific shapes, even abstract shapes, is so fundamental that it guides perception before we are consciously aware of it. . . . The ‘bouba-kiki’ effect, originally reported over 85 years ago and replicated many times since, shows that people consistently pair the soft-sounding nonsense word ‘bouba’ with soft-looking, round shapes and they typically pair the sharp-sounding nonsense word ‘kiki’ with spiky-looking, angular shapes. This effect seems to emerge across cultures and age groups.”  A press release issued as the Hung/Styles/Hsieh study was published quotes author Shao-Min Hung of Duke-NUS Medical School in Singapore as stating that “The findings here show that once we have learned the sound of a letter, we are able to . . . map this unconsciously extracted sound to an unconscious shape.’”  

“Words Can Sound ‘Round’ or ‘Sharp’ Without Us Realizing It.”   2017. Press release, Association for Psychological Science,

Liou and Lan investigated “cultural differences in creative behaviors.”  They report that “Western norms prioritize originality and Eastern norms usefulness. . . . Compared with Taiwanese, Americans generated more original ideas when they worked in a group or when the task required them to select ideas for further elaboration. . . . In contrast, compared with Americans, Taiwanese generated more useful ideas when they worked in a group or when the task required them to select ideas for further elaboration. . . . although Americans and Taiwanese were equally capable of generating original and useful ideas, Taiwanese teams tended to express useful ideas and hold back original ones in group discussion. In contrast, American teams tended to hold back useful ideas.”

Shyhnan Liou and Xuezhao Lan.  “Situational Salience of Norms Moderates Cultural Differences in the Originality and Usefulness of Creative Ideas Generated or Selected by Teams.”  Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, in press.

A team of British researchers, Gardner, Smith, and Mansfield, studied the general public’s response to research encouraging people to spend less time sitting at work.  Their findings indicate how important it is to effectively communicate with users when environments/objects are, or may be, changed.  The Gardner team report that “In June 2015, an expert consensus guidance statement was published recommending that office workers accumulate 2–4 h of standing and light activity daily and take regular breaks from prolonged sitting. This paper describes public responses to media coverage of the guidance. . . . Challenges were made [via public comments on the coverage] to the novelty of the guidance, the credibility of its authors, the strength of its evidence base, and its applicability to [real-world] UK workplaces. Public health was commonly mistrusted and viewed as a tool for controlling the public. . . . Interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour should seek to increase motivation by clearly communicating the health relevance of sitting, standing and light physical activity, in language easily understood by a general public that may lack sufficient interest to process nuanced messages discerning static and ‘active’ standing. . . . Such interventions might also present evidence to tackle potential disbelief in the health value of displacing sitting with standing.”

Benjamin Gardner, Lee Smith, and Louise Mansfield.  2017.  “How Did the Public Respond to the 2015 Expert Consensus Public Health Guidance Statement on Workplace Sedentary Behaviour?  A Qualitative Analysis.”  BMC Public Health,

Kaiser, Schreier, and Janiszewski link product customization and enhanced performance.  Their research “demonstrates that the self-expressive customization [this would be a modification that reflects the user’s beliefs, ideas about who they are as a person, membership in a group, etc.] of a product can improve performance on tasks performed using the customized product. Five studies show that the effect is robust across different types of tasks (e.g., persistence tasks, concentration tasks, agility tasks). The evidence further shows that the effect is not due to changes in product efficacy [effectiveness] beliefs, feelings of competence, feelings of accomplishment. . . . Instead, the self-expressive customization of a product extends an identity (e.g., personal identity, group identity) into the product.  When the product is subsequently used to pursue a goal whose desired outcome can affirm the extended identity, performance improves.”  So, if a knife is customized to indicate that someone is a chef, performance will improve on tasks related to being a chef.

Ulrike Kaiser, Martin Schreier, and Chris Janiszewski.  “The Self-Expressive Customization of a Product Can Improve Your Performance.”  Journal of Marketing Research, in press.

Wang, Krishna, and McFerran studied how consumers’ environmentally responsible behavior is affected by the actions of organizations.  They report that “Firms can save considerable money if consumers conserve resources (e.g., if hotel patrons turn off the lights when leaving the room, restaurants patrons use fewer paper napkins, or airline passengers clean up after themselves).”  Data gathered “in real-world hotels . . . show that consumers' conservation behavior is affected by the extent to which consumers perceive the firm as being green. . . . consumer perceptions of firms' greenness and consumer conservation behavior depend on (a) whether the firm requests them to conserve resources, (b) the firm's own commitment to the environment, and (c) the firm's price image. . . . firm requests to consumers to save resources can create consumer reactance [resistance] and can backfire when firms themselves do not engage in visible costly environmental efforts. Such reactance is more likely for firms with a high price image. . . . by spending a little money to signal environmental commitment, firms can save even more money through consumers' conservation of resources, resulting in wins for the firm, the consumer, and the environment."

Wenbo Wang, Aradhna Krishna, and Brent McFerran.  “Turning Off the Lights:  Consumers’ Environmental Efforts Depend on Visible Efforts of Firms.”  Journal of Marketing Research, in press.

Currie studied how the design of small urban parks.  She learned that “Public parks contribute to neighbourhood quality of life, promote a more public daily life, serve as important focal points for neighbourhoods, and provide access to nearby nature as part of the built environment. . . . This research identified design principles that good, small urban parks share – including accessibility, specificity, authenticity, functionality, and adaptability – applicable in smaller cities, towns, and lower density areas.”  

Melissa Currie.  2017.  “A Design Framework for Small Parks in Ultra-Urban, Metropolitan, Suburban and Small Town Settings.”  Journal of Urban Design, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 76-95.


Subscribe to Latest Blog Posts